by Craig Willms
What is true? Can you even know the truth? It's a real question, it's an important question, but ultimately it may prove to be unanswerable. Or is it as Jack Nicholson once declared, "You can't handle the truth!"
We hear the often-used quip 'there's only one truth'. Or this one, 'you're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts'. Is that so? Well, what is actually true? What are the facts? There are obvious truths like the fact that water is wet, and concrete is hard and so on. But even that's questionable, ice is water and it's not wet, and before concrete sets it's not hard. Truth is a slippery devil.
Perhaps there are no simple truths. Who's to say. Setting aside the eternal questions and all the philosophical quagmires and just focusing on daily life "the truth" is even more perplexing. Looking at the news media, academia, the corporate and political arena the truth is nearly impossible to establish. Because of the Internet, I assume, with its access to many, many viewpoints, we've finally begun to ask questions that were historically stifled by the powers that be, the gatekeepers. It does not mean the truth has become clear, if anything it's more muddled than ever, but at least the subject is now open and is being examined. Many of the traditional icons of truth are being exposed as liars or charlatans.
When are people going to think critically and take everything that comes from the news media with a grain of salt, instead of the holy grail. I can only speak to the American media but assume the rest of humanity is equally foolish. In America we've taken to calling the news media the alphabets. On one side, the blue side, we have ABC, AP, CBS, CNN, LAT, MSNBC, NBC, NYT, PBS, WaPo - the alphabets. On the other side, the red side, we have Fox News (or, that f_cking Fox News) and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. In the last thirty years we can add talk radio to this side. Radio? What's that? All kidding aside radio has declined exponentially in the modern era. It's gotten to the point where auto manufactures are not even going to include AM radio in new cars. Why cut AM radio? Could it be that's where talk radio exists?
Back in the day local newspapers and the three TV networks had the monopoly on the news we were fed. It was the pinnacle of trust in media, and the fact that they all said the same thing only solidified their lofty perch. What most people didn't know and still don't is that the media had been infiltrated long ago by the intelligence community (read CIA) which steers the media where they want it to go. They've only got in deeper as time passed. This isn't a goofy conspiracy theory it's been corroborated numerous times by people inside and outside the IC. It explains why the alphabets all work in lockstep within 'the narrative'. The narrative? A set of approved truths and beliefs. For sixty years now the narratives are always set by the left to the benefit of the Democratic Party. That f_ckng Fox News and talk radio became safe harbor for those resistant to the narrative, but they too were ultimately part of the narrative.
The Internet age has opened the door for more discussion of more viewpoints allowing anti-narrative thoughts to get out. As podcasts and alternative news sources have proliferated the traditional media has lost a lot of clout, and rightly so. There is no more stranglehold on the news that's fit to print. There are numerous alternative narratives that are proliferated via the Internet, but none have their hooks in the greater culture like the major media, academia and corporate/government cabal.
You would think that all these previously suppressed viewpoints would illuminate the truth, anything but. What this newfound scrutiny has exposed is the width and breadth of the approved narrative as the allowed truth. Stray from allowed truth and suffer the potential penalties of such misbehavior. The left's dominance for setting table for what is true may be coming to an end. The news media is the first to fall. Will academia be next?
The education industry from kindergarten to the Ivy League has become a cesspool of deception. This has been known for years. At the beginning the gate keepers of public education and state funded universities filtered what was taught with a decidedly pro-American slant. The negative aspects of American history were whitewashed or ignored completely. Schools were propaganda mills. Since the 1960's that has been turned completely on its head. In recent decades students are taught that the United States is the bane of the world. That is the current narrative. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
Public primary education has been captured by the teacher's unions, and it serves the union's interests instead of the students. Parents are not welcome. In recent decades test scores have plummeted, and graduation rates have tanked particularly in the inner cities. Traditional subjects and courses were eliminated and culturally taboo subjects taught to younger and younger children. This fed the universities blank slates, young minds to be formed. The modern university is no longer a place for open discussion and an exchange of ideas. People who buck the narrative are cancelled and are run off campus. Those students who challenge the allowed beliefs are punished, eventually they either shut up or leave. The rest graduate with the narrative fully implanted.
Science and medicine are particularly touchy subjects. Science, the seeker of truth, is something to be admired. However, since so much of science is done by universities it had become captive to the narrative as well. Corporate and government interests have also stifled science by steering it into serving corporate profit or government control, as in the clout and regulation of the pharma business. Moreover, the science industrial complex as some have called it, is not involved in finding the truth as most people believe but interested only in the funding pipeline. To attract funding published articles in the prestige journals and university presses are paramount. There's a term for this that says it all - publish or perish. This leads to safe bets, not groundbreaking theories. In other words, don't rock the boat, and disavow and stifle anyone who dares propose disruptive new theories. Breakthroughs by oddball geniuses are becoming rare, because no one will fund the oddball. Is this science?
Science needs to be freed from this hamster wheel.
Corporate and political interests have bred a bottomless pit of untruth. There is no truth seeking, it's all deception, all the time. It's all designed to steer someone to buy a product or elect a so-called leader. The corporate/government cabal and the media that they control in turn control the narrative...
Controlled the narrative, that is. No longer. Things are changing.
It was Covid-19 that showed us glimpses of the truth. The mainstream media collectively revealed that they are the communication and propaganda arm of the corporate/government collective. Trust in media has fallen to its lowest point. It's not bouncing back as Covid fades. Science and medicine followed suit, "trust the science" was the command, which is whatever they said it was regardless of their own counter factual evidence. Rebel scientists and doctors were falsely discredited and, in some cases, fired for questioning the Covid narrative. Governments at all levels became megalomaniacal, threatening to smackdown anyone not following the lockdowns. Eventually, they demanded citizens submit to a potentially dangerous experimental vaccine (that wasn't a vaccine at all). Corporations fell in lockstep with the government and flooded the airwaves with ad after ad that spewed the Covid narrative at us 24/7.
No comments:
Post a Comment