by Craig Willms
When the Revolutionary War broke out it was inevitable the locals "the Americans" would prevail. Britain was a three month trip one away, resupply was difficult. And so the war was won and by the time the next big war came along the country spread from sea to shining sea. All countries in proximity to America were small and weak. The population was a broad mix of disaffected expatriates from Europe. They came to be free, free to succeed and build a better life in a country that codified such freedoms in it's founding documents. The American Dream was born.
This is all to say that it's obvious that free people would succeed in such a system, and were destined to be citizens of a great and powerful nation. America is the most powerful nation in the world because of those freedoms. So why is socialism, which is the opposite of freedom, ascending? Do people really equate free stuff with freedom, individual freedom?
I honestly can't understand how anyone could favor full government control over EVERYTHING to individual personal freedom. Someone should explain it to me, explain socialism on it's own merits. Explain it as if the next question is always "what is the incentive for that".
Simply put, human nature is based on incentive, 'what's in it for me?' We are individuals, we are not a hive. We work for ourselves. Anything short of that is slavery. Why would people be voting for slavery?
If you really look at world history, most of the innovation that has enhanced human condition in the past two centuries has come out of the West. These innovations have raised the world out of abject poverty. Increasingly innovation is coming out of only one country, the United States of America. Why is that? Could it be that as Europe slides deeper into the abyss there's no incentive to create or innovate there. The exceptional people move to America as do the exceptional people from Asia. They thrive in America, their ideas thrive. They go on to become billionaires because they can, they are free to earn as much as they can in America. That's why they move to America.
Other countries, particularly Japan have succeeded in refining and perfecting many of those innovations, and still other countries have taken those innovations and streamlined them to achieve maximum efficiency and maximum profit. All of this is based on the incentive to increase individual or national wealth. Where would China be without American and Western innovations?
It's simple, innovation and progress does not come out of slavery or collectivist societies, it comes from free people.
Are people entertaining socialism because the current form of crony capitalism practiced in the world today is grotesquely unfair? Yes, probably. But to support government control of all enterprises removes not only incentive but also all accountability. Where do you go to petition for change when the egregious party is the government? Private businesses and conglomerates are eventually accountable to their customers and the 'government' to some degree. Government is supposed to be a backstop; it's supposed to level the playing field. In today's world it's not doing that - and it never will under socialism because the government is the playing field. (I use the word socialism to categorize all collectivist forms of government including communism, authoritarianism and fascism etc, etc).
The only solution that would preserve individualism and freedom and the incentive to be a high achiever is to pry the crony from the capitalism. The solution is most definitely not socialism. Socialism has failed in theory and in practice over and over. Why is it still around? It is dangerous nonsense.
So, as Europe gets closer and closer to nanny state socialist slavery the worse their economies perform and the worse their societies become. Nearly 50% of what they earn as individuals is taken by the government. Taken from the productive and given to foreign loafers. It has lowered living standards all across Europe. That's approaching anti-freedom, I dare say it's approaching government slavery. The native populations in most European countries are becoming irate, and they have every right to.
I would ask Americans, "is that what you want?" I certainly don't. Perversely the crony system won't change until there is an incentive for that to happen. The current masters of this cronyized form of capitalism have every incentive to keep things the way they are.
I don't know the answers, not all of them. The first thing that has to happen in my estimation is for someone to come along with the courage to challenge the system. By system I mean the cozy system that keeps our elected officials rich, fat and happy. We have to get corporate and special interest money out of politics, to stop allowing them to buy off politicians and write their own legislation. I've heard this all my life and it has never been more true.
The U.S. congress is utterly dysfunctional, and thus completely ineffectual. It has been for decades. They are incompetent grifters. Sure, they all go to Washington DC with all the piss and vinegar their high and mighty egos can muster, but soon they become puppets, very, very rich puppets. It's so lucrative they won't rock the boat; they can't rock the boat. It's frustrating for the rest of us. We all see it and yet there's nothing we can do about it.
It is this frustration that drives dissatisfaction, combined with the stupidity of the average ill-informed citizen it fuels the favor toward socialism. Yes, I said it, stupidity, or ignorance if you will... Our schools, universities and the dominant left-leaning media do not show us the truth about socialism and thus frustrated people are swayed by the bogus promises of collectivism. No one, not a one of them can point to a successful socialist country. They simply don't exist. Socialism is dangerous nonsense.